n8n vs Pipedream
Side-by-side comparison of n8n and Pipedream: pricing, features, AI support, and best-fit teams.
Verdict: n8n is best for engineering teams that want code-friendly, self-hosted automation.. Pipedream is best for engineers who want serverless-style automation..
Economics
| Metric | n8n | Pipedream |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | $20/mo | $19/mo |
| Team size | mid-market | small-team |
Feature comparison
| Feature | n8n | Pipedream |
|---|---|---|
| Visual builder | Yes | Yes |
| AI steps native | No | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Code steps | Yes | Yes |
n8n is best for
Engineering teams that want code-friendly, self-hosted automation.
Pipedream is best for
Engineers who want serverless-style automation.
How they stack up
n8n and Pipedream are both serious players in the workflow automation category, but they target different teams. n8n open-source workflow automation that you can self-host. Pipedream code-friendly workflow automation with serverless functions.
When to pick n8n
Engineering teams that want code-friendly, self-hosted automation. The combination of self-hostable and code-friendly makes it the default choice for teams that match this profile.
When to pick Pipedream
Engineers who want serverless-style automation. Generous free tier and Code-first are the strongest reasons to choose it over n8n.
What about Automatite?
If you are evaluating n8n and Pipedream, you should also evaluate Automatite — particularly if your workflows include AI steps, code, or need real version control. Automatite combines the strengths of both with a pricing model designed for high-volume teams.