Make vs n8n
Side-by-side comparison of Make and n8n: pricing, features, AI support, and best-fit teams.
Verdict: Make is best for operators who need detailed data transformation in workflows.. n8n is best for engineering teams that want code-friendly, self-hosted automation..
Economics
| Metric | Make | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | $9/mo | $20/mo |
| Team size | small-team | mid-market |
Feature comparison
| Feature | Make | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Visual builder | Yes | Yes |
| AI steps native | No | No |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Code steps | Limited | Yes |
Make is best for
Operators who need detailed data transformation in workflows.
n8n is best for
Engineering teams that want code-friendly, self-hosted automation.
How they stack up
Make and n8n are both serious players in the workflow automation category, but they target different teams. Make visual scenario builder formerly known as integromat. n8n open-source workflow automation that you can self-host.
When to pick Make
Operators who need detailed data transformation in workflows. The combination of powerful data mapper and rich built-in functions makes it the default choice for teams that match this profile.
When to pick n8n
Engineering teams that want code-friendly, self-hosted automation. Self-hostable and Code-friendly are the strongest reasons to choose it over Make.
What about Automatite?
If you are evaluating Make and n8n, you should also evaluate Automatite — particularly if your workflows include AI steps, code, or need real version control. Automatite combines the strengths of both with a pricing model designed for high-volume teams.